There are two common misconceptions about Rules for Submission VIII.1.a, the "complexity rule of thumb" for armory:
Isabel of Biconyll. Device. Or, a beacon sable enflamed gules atop a mount sable, a bordure vert semy of oak leaves Or.
Elena Anne of Lostwithiel. Device. Per pall inverted vert, argent and purpure, in chief two chevronels counterchanged and in base a rose between four crescents in cross argent.
Another "complexity" comment which has been appearing periodically in commentary is the inclusion of a complex line of division in a submission with the "complexity count". The "rule of thumb" included in RfS VIII.1.a. is clear: "the total of the number of tinctures plus the number of types of charges in a design should not exceed eight." While it is true that a complex line of division may add some "busy-ness" to a piece of armory, it does not do so nearly to the same extent as adding different types of charges or more tinctures. As a consequence, a complex line of division should not be included in an VIII.1.a. "complexity count" when addressing an armory submission.
© 6 July 1998 Daniel de Lincolia (Tim McDaniel)
These pages are maintained by
.
Please contact Edward with any corrections/changes.
Standard Disclaimer