[These are the standards that became operational for Middle Kingdom Crown Tourneys during Sir William’s tenure as Earl Marshal]

 

Proposed Marshaling Standards For Crown Tournament

by William of Fairhaven, Middle Kingdom Earl Marshal KSCA OP

September 1996 Revision 4

 

Intended Audience: This document is designed for use by the Crown of the Middle Kingdom, all members of the Chivalry of the Middle Kingdom (especially those marshaling in Crown Tournament), and all Crown Tournament competitors. It is not a private document and my be distributed to anyone interested in reading it pending approval of the current Crown. This is a lengthy document and although it was not written with the intent of discussing general fighting problems in the Middle Kingdom there is some overlap in that area.

 

Note to all readers: Some of these rules may seem harsh in comparison to how Crown Tournament has been run in the past. However, I think we can all safely acknowledge the fact that there have been some problems which seem to recur frequently in Crown. My premise on creating these marshaling guidelines is based on the idea that ninety-eight times out of a hundred, any problems viewed by the marshals are unintentional and once the fighter has been made aware of an oversight, he/she will wish to correct it instantly. The fighters in this category are not the problem with Crown Tournament. These rules are more specifically designed to allow the marshals to cope with the two in a hundred fighters who, for whatever reason, is having a really bad day and will not or cannot be made to see his/her own problems. These guidelines give the marshals some teeth in dealing with combatants who are having real problems in the list. These measures will certainly not be popular the first few times they are enforced. However, once everyone realizes the rules will be enforced, I feel Crown will grow into the sort of tourney worthy of its name.

 

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

 

Crown Tournament. No other tournament evokes such strong emotion in both fighter and spectators alike. Skill, competition, and pageantry are all foremost in a tournament whose victor will be named as Tanist of our kingdom and who will, in time, sit upon the Dragon Throne as King. This tournament should be the showpiece of each reign wherein honor, chivalry and courtesy are displayed in all actions. However, too often, Crown Tournament has been the field for some of the worst displays seen in any of the lists of our kingdom. And, while we know the competitors to be honorable and chivalrous, too often adrenaline and desire have overridden courtesy and judgment leaving the competitors themselves, the marshals, the Crown, and the tournament in a somewhat less than complimentary light. The problems we (as marshals) have all seen in the lists must be addressed if this fine tournament can ever hope to live up to the ideals that have been set for it.

 

As marshals, we have undertaken a trust, and often, pressures of a political or personal nature can affect our judgment in a Crown Tournament. We all strive to do our best, but we are often hamstrung by our own wishes not to call the honor of another into question. In some cases, this has been exploited, and fights that should have been stopped have continued to a very unsatisfactory conclusion where one or the other of the competitors is unsatisfied. Furthermore, in some fights, the spectators have shown a great dissatisfaction over what they thought should have been the outcome of a given fight. As marshals, we all know how difficult it is to judge blows thrown by another person. However, by the time we have earned our warrants, and in many cases become  members of the chivalry, I believe most of us have a pretty good idea of what blows thrown are good and what blows are not. Years of training, participation in, and observation of hundreds or even thousands of fights have given us a unique knowledge of our sport. This knowledge exceeds that of fighters who are not marshals as it is born not just of participation, but of observation of many fights, forms, techniques, and styles of armour protection. We cannot continue to stand idle in a list where two fighters are bashing each other half to death and neither of them will say that he/she has landed a solid blow when it is obvious that one or both of them are dead. This concept is the basis for the following rules to be used in all Crown Tournaments during my tenure as Earl Marshal and with the consent of the Crown:

 


Basic Rules:

 

Who will be allowed to marshal Crown Tournament?

 

There is no privilege in marshaling Crown Tournament. All marshals must be acceptable to the Crown and the Earl Marshal. To this end, if you wish to be considered for marshal’s duty in Crown Tournament, you must contact me verbally, in writing, or by email not less than two weeks before the tournament. I will let you know if you will be needed. If you offer to marshal, and your offer is accepted, you must show up. THERE WILL BE NO WALK ON MARSHALING IN CROWN TOURNAMENT. PERIOD. Regardless of your status as Royal Peer, Member of the Chivalry, or just All-Around-Swell-Guy, you will not be allowed to walk in and marshal at Crown. Do not show up at Crown assuming you will be allowed to marshal. If you have not spoken with me, you will not be marshaling. As an additional point, no competitor may marshal after he/she has been eliminated.

 

What is the marshaling structure for Crown List?

 

Assuming there are two lists, each list will have five marshals. Each list will be run by a Royal Peer (preferably a Duke) who is an experienced marshal up on all current standards and rules. There will be four marshals in the list at all times. The extra marshal is there to give each of the marshals in the list a break when they need it and to step in when one of the marshals must step out due to a conflict of interest. The Earl Marshal will be standing between the lists and watching some fights from either list. If I perceive there is a problem I will step in, but in all other cases, the Royal Peer in charge of the list will be running the show.

 

[Amendment (September Revision): Due to the overwhelming and enthusiastic response from the Chivalry, I will be trying to work more marshals into the tournament. I envision a rotation that will allow more marshals to participate in the earlier rounds. This number will then reduce to a smaller and smaller group as we get further and further into the tournament. I will be keeping all interested parties informed as things progress.]

 

What is a ‘conflict of interest’ in Crown Tournament?

 

No marshal may marshal a fight where one of the combatants is his/her squire/apprentice/protégé, member of his/her household, an extremely close personal acquaintance, or someone they have specifically spent time training for competition in Crown Tournament. In addition, no marshal may marshal any fight when he/she has a strong dislike or known personal problem with one of the combatants. Most of the personal problems between fighter are fairly well publicized or at least known to the chivalry. Marshals are on their honor to step out of fights where they may have a personal conflict with a combatant that might cloud their judgment. If a marshal with a known conflict of this type does not step out of the list and any of the other marshalate staff know one exists, that marshal will be asked to leave the list for the duration of the fight. I am not making this rule due to a lack of trust with the marshals. Anytime this sort of conflict of interest occurs, the possible perception of impropriety, favoritism, etc. seems to rear its ugly head. We will cut the head off the serpent before it shows itself by not allowing this situation to occur. There will be enough marshals at all times, so just step out if you have to and take a break. Once the fight is over you can step right back into the list and continue marshaling.

 

How will armour inspections be conducted?

 

If possible, the Earl Marshal will work with local marshals to have inspections the night before the tourney. This helps to reduce the things that need to get done day-of and speeds the tournament along. All inspecting marshals will be assigned. Once again, you may not inspect armour or weapons, etc. unless you have spoken with me in advance. The Earl Marshal will be using unique stickers or stamps for the inspection of armour and weapons in Crown. Currently we do not have any way of verifying that a weapon has been inspected prior to its entry into the list other than the honor of the user. We will not impugn the honor of the combatants, but everyone is human, and sometimes someone grabs a sword or mace that wasn’t inspected. Ninety-nine times out of a hundred, there’s no problem. But if one problem occurs we (the marshals) are as guilty as the fighter using the unapproved weapon for not making sure it was inspected. The stickers or stamps will be issued by the Earl Marshal to approved inspecting marshals. All weapons and armour including shields will be stickered (a sticker on the helmet or gorget will be sufficient for the full armour). Marshals will make sure that all items brought or worn into the list have this sticker before the fight begins. Also, this will help in situations where a fighter needs to borrow a weapon: if it’s already been stickered, anyone can use it. All separate components will be stickered, but the suit of armour worn by the combatant shall count as one unit (shields will be stickered separately). The sticker must be visible, but does not need to be on the helmet. Many fighters (myself included) hate having little stickers on their shiny helmets. Make sure the sticker is in a place where it can be seen, so the cursory inspection before fighting is quick, or make sure it is in a place where the marshal can quickly find it once the fighter tells him/her where it is at. Shields can be stickered on the inside, and weapons will be stickered near the hilt for swords and towards the butt end for pole weapons.

 

How can I get thrown out of the list?

 

In this Crown Tournament, certain rules and procedures will be enforced to the maximum extent of the law. This will make it much easier to get thrown out of the list and forfeit the fight or potentially forfeit your position in the tournament. Most of these rules have only been broken in rare circumstances, but once or twice in a tournament can cast a shadow over the entire proceedings in the eyes of the populace and that must not be allowed to occur. These rules are based on safety, courtesy, and common sense. Anyone who has been accepted as a competitor in Crown Tournament should have no problems obeying them. There are three major ways you can be removed from the list.

 

1. Entering the list under false pretenses: This covers attempting to use an unapproved weapon or changing your armour after it has been inspected. Breaking any of the rules of this list which a fighter claims he/she is familiar with is grounds for an instant forfeit of the fight and a trip to the Marshal’s Quarter Court (to be held immediately following the tournament). I do realize that anyone can make a mistake. If, for some reason, a combatant enters the list with a weapon that has not been inspected, armour that has not been inspected, etc. the first thing the marshal who notices the problem should do is to question the fighter as to why his/her equipment/armour/etc. has not been inspected. If the fighter has a reasonable explanation (“Oops. Sorry. Grabbed the wrong sword. Let me get the right one.) correct the problem and then allow the bout to commence. I strongly encourage all fighters to get all weapons they might conceivably use under any circumstance inspected. This will make things run more smoothly and help to keep breaks in the fighting due to unforeseen weapon changes to a minimum. To help enforce this rule, all fighters will receive a cursory inspection prior to each fight to make sure they have the appropriate stickers. A fighter may not bring a weapon into the list and then ask for a quick inspection to ge the weapon in use for that fight. Inspecting marshals will be available throughout the day at the lists if a new weapon needs to be inspected for some reason. Marshals standing in the lists MAY NOT inspect and stamp a weapon or piece of armour during the tournament. That is the job of the inspecting marshals and they will be around the lists at all times.

 

2. Unchivalrous or discourteous behavior in the lists: This includes throwing a tantrum in the lists, rude behavior towards the marshals, the Crown or your opponent, and foul or profane language. While these offenses may vary in severity (which will basically determine whether or not you have to go to the Quarter Court), they will cause you to automatically forfeit the fight. We will make allowances for an individual using overly colorful language as a direct result of a low shot, exceptionally hard shot to an unarmoured area, etc. However, the fighter had best recover his composure immediately or he/she will be subject to this rule. Keeping cool and controlled is one of the basic tenets of armoured combat. If a combatant shows a lack of simple self-control, he/she will be asked to leave the list.

 

3. Failure to accept fair blows: This is the most tenuous of all conditions, but I believe we have the skill and knowledge to call fairly when the situation has gotten out of hand. The marshals will not wait for the striking fighter to say the blow is good. A majority of three of the four marshals in a list is good enough to call a fighter dead. This is not something I want to see happening often, but we have too often run into a situation where one fighter has blistered another repeatedly with hard solid blows, but refuses to say he/she successfully struck his opponent so as not to impugn his/her opponents honor. This has lead to many bad fights that ended with damaged reputations, damaged feelings, and occasionally damaged bodies. This will not be tolerated. A majority of marshals will be good enough to stop a fight. Fair blows are defined in detail later in this document.

 

How do I settle a grievance?

 

If you have a grievance with a call by the marshals, you have two options: (1) Appeal the decision through the Marshals Chain of Command; In this case your first line of appeals is to the Earl Marshal; If you do not get satisfaction there you may appeal to the Crown; There is no higher appeal available to you at the tournament than the Crown and their decision shall be final in all matters of appeal, (2) Take your grievance to the Marshal’s Court directly following the tournament. Each of the methods has a purpose of resolution. Appealing Marshal’s Chain of Command is an immediate attempt to overturn the decision of the marshals in the list. The list will be maintained until the grievance is settled. If the Earl Marshal or the Crown sees fit to overturn the decision of the marshals, the fight can be resumed. There is no higher appeal than the Crown, so if they decide against you the bout in concluded. If your grievance is more procedural or more involved with the methods being used, please bring it before the Marshal’s Court following the tournament. The Earl Marshal and his staff are not inflexible, and we would welcome commentary and constructive criticisms of how these new procedures will be implemented. Anyone can come to Marshal’s Court, but it is usually attended only by marshals, fighters with grievances, or fighters called to court for the discussion of disciplinary matters. There are no other methods of appeal in Crown Tournament, and I personally recommend keeping a cool head if you plan to use any method of appeal. Poor behavior and righteous indignation are not likely to get you very far if you wish to appeal a decision in the tournament.

 

 

Definitions and Procedures:

 

A fair blow is defined as a blow that appears to hit the target in a crisp and unimpeded manner with what appears to be sufficient force. Each marshal must judge whether or not he/she thinks the blow was landed with sufficient force, but the signs are usually obvious. Some signs of a potentially good blow: the opponent struck yelps or grunts loudly from the force of the blow (the famous words of “Ow! Light!” often indicate some sort of calibration problem), the area struck can be seen to physically move from the force of the blow (this is especially true with helmets), an extremely loud sound accompanies the strike (while this is not always a fair indication, coupled with other observations it can provide valuable information on whether a blow was potentially good or not). As a regular practice in tournament, I usually give anybody one blow unless it is really flagrant. This is both a good and bad practice. For novice fighters who are often still learning, it can often take a second or two for them to figure out what was good or not good. Sometimes a newer fighter will die from a delayed reaction and stopping a fight too quickly takes that away from them. On the other hand, a really good fighter only needs to miss a single blow and he/she will usually win the fight. Too often, this occurs between unbelted and belted fighters in Crown. Now, I’m not accusing anyone of anything. I’m just saying that when a competitor has a good chance of winning, the adrenaline levels tend to rise as he/she gets more and more into the fight. Sometimes, a lower skill fighter gets a lucky shot and it goes uncalled even when the fighter obviously thinks its good and shows it by body position, etc. Too often, marshals will not stop a fight to discuss what is going on even though its pretty obvious something has happened. Problems of this nature tend to escalate as the skill level of the competitors escalates. And, as it seems to me in the past, the marshals seem even more reluctant to stop fights between members of the Chivalry until things have gotten way out of hand. Getting back to the original point, if a blow lands clean and apparently hard, I would like to see the fight stopped so we can find out why the blow wasn’t registered.

 

As a procedure, I envision the list being conducted in as follows:

 

A fight between Lord Smith and Sir Johnson is about to take place. The fighters have entered the list area and are waiting for the herald to announce the fight. Two of the four marshals in the list use this time to give each fighters a quick check for the appropriate stickers/stamps to make sure their equipment has been inspected. Finding no problems with the equipment, the herald reads the litany and then gives the list over to the marshal in charge of that specific list. The marshal instructs the fighters to guard themselves and the fight begins. As the fight progresses, it becomes obvious that Sir Johnson is fatigued and he fails to call a clear unimpeded blow that seems to land with sufficient force to his leg. From the perspective of at least one of the marshals, there seemed to be no reason Sir Johnson should have failed to call the blow. The marshal viewing the problems calls a hold. The marshals step in and ask Lord Smith if he thought something landed. Lord Smith questions the leg blow that he just threw. The marshals make a quick check for majority. If one exists the head marshal of the list will go to Sir Johnson and question him politely about the miss-called blow. Once the question is put to Sir Johnson one of two things will happen: (1) Sir Johnson will agree with the marshal, (2) He will not agree with the marshals. If Sir Johnson agrees with the marshals the fight may be continued with Sir Johnson dropping to the ground and the marshals continuing the fight. If Sir Johnson does not agree with the marshals judgment, he must offer some reasonable explanation for why he is not taking the blow. In most cases, the marshals (from their various vantages) have more information on what happened with the blow (I.E., Sir Johnson says, “I thought I caught some of the blow on my shield.” Marshal A, “It did not appear the blow touched your shield in any way, sir.”, Marshal B, “It looked clean from my angle.”, Marshal C, “I did not have a clear view of the blow.”, Marshal D, “It appeared you did not get your shield there before you were hit.”). The fighter whose judgment is being called into question shall be given an opportunity to express what he thought happened, but I do not want it to turn into a long drawn out discussion whereby the fighter being questioned is going on and on in order to overturn the marshals majority when the blow appeared good from their perspective. If the fighter cannot offer a reasonable explanation for why he should not take the blow, the marshal in charge of the list will politely ask him to take the blow. If the fighter refuses, the marshal may ask a second time. If the fighter still refuses, then he/she will be instructed to take the blow or leave the list and forfeit the fight. The fighter may appeal to the Earl Marshal (if the EM was not marshalling the bout). If the Earl Marhal supports the decision of the list marshals (an extremely likely occurrence), the combatant may appeal to the Crown. If the blow in question was not lethal, the fight can continue. If the blow in question was lethal or the fighter forfeits the fight, the fight is over and the victor is announced. If the blow was not lethal (a leg or arm shot), the limb is lost and the fight continues.

 

I realize this is an idealized situation, and is how things should go in most cases. For this method to occur, the fighter striking the blow must say the blow was good, not good, or unknown. Reality Check. Several problems with the above procedure can and do occur quite frequently.

 

(1) Lord Smith is concerned about calling the honor of his opponent into question. This is especially true if the fighter whose judgment is being questioned is a member of the Chivalry. Many fighters will suffer the loss of a fight rather than say anything about a member of the chivalry no matter how flagrant the offense. This includes other members of the chivalry. We will not wait for the fighter striking the blow to tell us with absolute certainty he thought the blow was good. Unless he says with absolute certainty the blow is NOT good, then the above procedure will be carried out to its logical conclusion.

 

(2) Lord Smith will not call the honor of any combatant in to question under any circumstance. This is basically the same as #1. What I do not want to see is the marshal standing around while two fighters say “Up to you.” “No its up to you my lord.” “Oh no, its up to your honor, good sir.” “Nay, you must make that decision as honor dictates,” blah blah blah etc. This does not solve the problem and puts it right back in the hands of the fighters from where the problem originated. Do not let the fighters go on and on about the virtues of honor, etc. If there is a majority, make the call.

 

(3) Due to inexperience, Lord Smith really can’t tell what was good or not. In this case, it’s up to the marshals to make the right call if all other factors indicate a clear course of action.

 

I do not want to see long drawn out discussions in the list. If a marshal or marshals have stopped a fight it is because they already perceive there to be a problem. They will talk among themselves and then check with the fighters in order to facilitate a good decision. There is no need for lots of long discussion on what is going on. Keep it simple and stick to the facts of the specific event. A short discussion is always in order if such an event occurs, but no more than a minute or two should be necessary. If the marshals have a clear direction to follow, they should make the call. If they not sure then the fight should immediately be restarted. Any one marshal can call hold for a problem, but only a majority of marshals can call a fighter down. If no majority exists restart the fight as quickly as possible.

 

I’m fairly sure some members of the Chivalry are feeling insulted at this point. I apologize if the text has offended you, but I stand by what is said. Everyone, Chivalry and non-Chivalry have missed blows in Crown. Anyone who would deny this simple fact is either deceiving themselves or way out of touch with Crown in the last six to seven years. It is very important to me personally that ALL competitors to Crown feel they will be treated fairly. Currently this is not the case. True or not, there is a strong perception in this kingdom that unbelted fighters do not have a fair chance to win Crown. There is definitely the perception that the Chivalry will keep them from winning until such a time as they are ready to allow fighter so and so to succeed. Whether this is true or not (and I don’t really think it is), the perception is very strong and must have come from some action or inaction in the past related to Crown Tournament. This perception tarnishes the honor of the Order and Crown, and we must do what we can to clear up such a misunderstanding for the good of the Order, the tournament and the Crown.

 

Note: I realize that no one wants to interrupt the tempo of a fight. However, a seemingly obvious miscalled blow followed by a huge flurry by both combatants may make it potentially difficult to figure how who did what and when they did it in the timeline of the fight. We as marshals do not want to become judges and determine who wins and loses. It is my opinion that in 98 fights out of 100, as soon as an oversight in blow calling is pointed out to a fighter that fighter will take it immediately and probably apologize for the oversight to his/her opponent and the marshals. These rules are not aimed at that fighters. The other 2 cases in 100 are the problem fights that end unsatisfactorily for all involved. In those 2 cases (statistically speaking), for one reason or another a fighter has a real calibration/adrenaline problem, and rather than being reprimanded and removed from the list, he/she goes on to win a fight by non-acceptance of blows (either consciously or unconsciously). And, in Crown Tournament, this, in essence, rewards a person for failure to police their own calibration more closely. It sets a terrible example for the other fighters and the populace to see, and leaves the marshals looking like fumbling baboons. I am not saying that the populace can judge how a fight should have gone, but the perception of how a fight is carried out is very real to the spectators, and when a fighter is obviously failing to accept fair blows it can cast a shadow over the whole tournament. Although it is not often talked about, the marshals also have a duty to safeguard the honor of the combatants from themselves. That is to say, the marshals should be there to help fighters whose calibration is off for some reason. We can protect these fighters from themselves by pointing out problems and giving them an honorable solution to a fight. Too often, fighters are allowed to damage or even destroy their own reputations because marshals sit back and say, “Just let the fighters work it out.” That has been proven as an unsuccessful method of running a crown list. So, we are going to try something new.

 

I am of the firm opinion that the first time we must enforce the rules on someone (belt or unbelt), it is going to be very unpopular with that individual. No system is perfect, but I think a proactive stance at least as far as Crown Tournament is concerned will go a long way to improving the attitude and overall content of the tournament. I am not looking for scapegoats nor am I trying to settle any scores. I truly believe that we must begin to apply some form of punishment to those fighters that flagrantly disregard the rules of the list. This will send a clear message to all combatants and potential combatants that we are quite serious about the rules of the list, and that we will enforce them. I don’t think we will have to enforce them more than once or twice before everyone will get the idea they need to police themselves or they’re going to forfeit their fights and end up explaining themselves in marshal’s court.

 

For all of this to work their are two things that need to happen before the next Crown Tournament. The first is that the Chivalry support this change in marshaling methods. This support comes in two forms: supporting it publicly to the Crown, and carrying it out as marshals in Crown Tournament. Second, the fighters need to be made aware of how the marshals standards are going to be applied. They should get a copy of all of the above material and will be expected to read it. This will help get everyone on the same sheet of music and should smooth things over as we move into this new style of marshaling Crown Tournament.

 

It is my sincerest wish the marshals do not have to call even one fighter down in Crown. Education and understanding are the key to creating and promoting a better Crown Tournament. But, I myself and the marshals I select to man the lists will not hesitate to enforce the rules to the maximum extent possible if a fighter is disregarding them. The only appeal will be the Crown, and as things progress, the Crown will be walking hand-in-hand with the marshalate towards the ultimate goal of improving Crown Tournament.

 

One last note. I will back the decisions of the marshals in the lists as long as all calls are made within the guidelines of the text above. The Crown will be aware of the procedures we are using, and only marshals up on current standards and practices will be marshaling the tournament. With four marshals in the list to help each other, I do not envision any problems, but I will stand up to the Crown and support the list marshals to the best of my ability in the even the Crown does not agree as to what was done in a particular instance.

 

I look forward to comments from all active members of the chivalry. I will putting my list of marshals for Crown together in the very near future, so if you are interested in marshaling in Crown, you must contact me. The final draft of these new procedure must be completed not later than 30 days prior to Crown so everything can get mailed out.

 

 

Addendum To Crown Tournament Rules

 

The basis for the marshals calling a fight has many different angles that need to be understood before any sort of active marshaling in Crown Tournament can be done. The process of calling a fighter down must be done with care and there must be a very high degree of surety before such a thing can occur in the list.

 

Too often when people read these rules they think the marshals will be calling all the fights and acting as judges. This is not the case, and I personally do not want to see this occur. These rules are being put in place to give the marshals the ability to ends fights wherein one or both of the combatants are showing a disregard for the rules. I do not envision this occurring frequently (perhaps one or two fights in the entire tournament), but without the procedures in place, the marshals have to ‘wing-it’ which generally results in an unsatisfactory conclusion to a bout.

 

For the marshals to call a fighter on a blow several things must happen. The fighter must be struck with a clean, unimpeded blow that appears to land with sufficient force. At least three of the marshals in the list have to see the blow in order for form a majority. If there is no majority of marshals opinions there is no basis for a discussion and the fight should continue. The fighter striking the blow must agree the blow had the potential to be a good blow. If the fighter striking the blow categorically maintains the blow was not good all other arguments are mute and the fight will continue. Marshals should be careful of two circumstances where a fighter might call a good blow as not good: (1) A personality conflict between the two fighter is causing one of the fighters to continue hitting the other and not calling the blows, (2) A fighter will not call a blow good on another fighter simply for honor’s sake. In the first case, it should become readily apparent if one fighter is failing to take fair blows and another is continuously striking the first with hard unimpeded shots. While I have never witnessed such a fight, it at least needs to be mentioned. If the striking fighter states categorically the shot was not good and there is any chance at all that the shot was not good, the marshals will step back out and the fight will continue. In order for the marshals to say anything in a such a case, the blows in question would have to show themselves with such physical force as to be blatantly obvious (I.E., the subject of the blows is knocked off his/her feet from the force of the blows, etc.). This situation is really unlikely due to the fact that the fighter being struck would also have to be ignoring such forceful blows so I don’t think this situation will occur with any frequency whatsoever. The second case of a fighter not saying whether his/her blows are good for the sake of honor is much for common. In these cases the important factor is whether or not the fighter throwing the blows categorically states the blows are not good. Comments like, “It’s up to my opponent”, “I’m not sure”, or “I don’t care” give the marshals reasonable cause to pursue the issue if there is a majority of opinion. A strong majority of opinion between the marshals and a noncommittal opinion from the striking fighter can, in some cases, be sufficient for the marshals to request the fighter struck to take the blow.

 

There are a few additional things to look for when deciding how to call a bout:

 

(1) Is the conversation between the fighter friendly/civil or is it escalating tempers and becoming unfriendly? If the conversation is friendly and the fight is not looking too sloppy, let it continue. It is not my intention to interfere with the normal conversations that can occur in a bout. If things seem pleasant and do not appear to be getting out of hand, let the fight continue.

 

(2) Do the two fighter know each other well and fight together often? In many cases extreme familiarity between fighters can create what appears to be a sloppy fight. In reality it is more often the case that two fighter who train together frequently tend to call their blows more closely due to the familiar nature of the combat. If this is the case, the marshals may wish to caution the fighters that the fight is looking a little sloppy. Usually this is an easy situation to resolve due to the friendly nature of the competitors.

 

(3) Are the combatants known to actively dislike each other? While this is often an unknown factor, in some cases a ‘feud’ between fighters is well known to the marshals. Try to caution the combatants before the fight begins. Sometimes a simple word of advice can help to keep tempers down.

 

(4) Is one of the fighters known to be inexperienced in Crown Tournament (especially first appearance)? If this is known, the marshals may tell the fighter to relax and take it easy. Crown Tourney can inspire many things including fear and discomfort in new competitors. Often times the newer fighters aren’t quite up to speed with what is going on in the lists and a word or two can help to keep them calm. Over-adrenalizing is a common symptom of newness to the Tournament.

 

Please direct all comments to

 

William of Fairhaven,

mka

Pat Savelli

514 Brown St

Dayton OH 45402

513-223-0624

sirbill@dnaco.net