Re: [Mid] AoAs

From: <corwyn-msca_at_oaktree.net>
Date: Wed 30 Apr 1997 07:19:11 PM EDT
Message-Id: <199705010416.XAA09254@peace.oaktree.net>

        One of the best ways to correct oversights is to merge each group's
mailing/phone list with your order of presidencies and use duration of
activity in the SCA as the last item in the fields -just after AOA's.
Then you can see who has been overlooked.
                Jarl Master Corwyn Dragonstar

> >I believe the Award of Arms is an important award.
>
> > It definitely
> >makes people feel good, and it is in many ways an official "you're one
> >of us now".
> >
> >Dmitrii Volkovich
> >
>
> Okay, now I've heard several people say they don't have an AoA and
> they've been in the SCA for x number of years--both on and off the
> bridge. I agree (and it seems that most people I talk to also agree)
> that the AoA is a way of saying "you're one of us now". Well, what
> about those people who've been "one of us" for years and haven't been
> recognized? Isn't there some way to keep track of who's gotten their
> AoA and who hasn't? Maybe the people I've talked to have stronger
> opinions about this than most, but it seems that "late" AoAs are a cause
> of alot of ill feelings.
>
> Am I totally off on this one?
>
> Aveline
> From: "Harjamaki, Krista L" <KLHARJAMAKI@CSBSJU.EDU>
> +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ to unsubscribe, send a message to
> `~-, ,-~`~-, ,-~`~-, ,-~`~-, ,-~` sca-middle-request@dnaco.net with
> . | | | | | | | | 'unsubscribe' as its body.
>
>
From: corwyn-msca@oaktree.net
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ to unsubscribe, send a message to
`~-, ,-~`~-, ,-~`~-, ,-~`~-, ,-~` sca-middle-request@dnaco.net with
. | | | | | | | | 'unsubscribe' as its body.
Received on Thu May 1 00:15:59 1997

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu 04 Mar 2004 11:44:31 AM EST EST