Re: [Mid] Re:

Crystal_Glynn@mnd.uscourts.gov wrote:

> The language is edited but accurate. Most important --
> 47 U.S.C. section 227(b)(3) allows $500 in damages for each such
> violation, but if the violation is willful or knowingly, you can get
> treble damages (in the Court's discretion) - you could always add to the
> post something along the lines of if I ever hear from you again, I will
> assume that you have willfully or knowingly violated the Telephone
> Consumer Protection Act . . . etc.
>
> On a side note, this statute was challenged by numerous
> telemarketing groups as an unconstitutional free speech restriction. Most
> Courts rejected this argument and have upheld the statute. Seems to me
> that its a way to get off at least some spam-lists.

Crystal, I think I love you. <G>

Edward
From: Anthony Bryant <alcatraz@socantel.net>
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ to unsubscribe, send a message to
`~-, ,-~`~-, ,-~`~-, ,-~`~-, ,-~` sca-middle-request@dnaco.net with
. | | | | | | | | 'unsubscribe' as its body.
Received on Wed Dec 10 14:54:20 1997