On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Charles J. Cohen wrote:
}>Something I've wondered about...can't 0 be treated as a shorthand symbol for
}>the infinitely small, just as "infinity" is a shorthand symbol for the
}>infinitely large?
}
}A neat idea! But no, I don't think so, because zero is really a
}number, an integer, and thus has a (finite and specific) value.
}Infinity doesn't.
Well let me ask you this--can yo uconstruct a statement that is true f 0 but
not true of an infinitely small number?
Fairfax
From: Alan Terlep <atterlep@oakland.edu>
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ to unsubscribe, send a message to
`~-, ,-~`~-, ,-~`~-, ,-~`~-, ,-~` majordomo@midrealm.org with
. | | | | | | | | 'unsubscribe sca-middle' as its body.
Received on Tue Dec 21 11:48:28 1999
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu 04 Mar 2004 08:35:42 AM EST EST