Beth Montano wrote:
> Guillan: A mutual friend of ours has all but given up the SCA for
> CW. Thorgerdr. While she is part of a
> unit (6th Ohio) that does allow women in the ranks (and she does a
> great male impression), her new husband
> is part of a unit (14th (or is it 114th?) Illinois) that does not, and
> I do understand why.
>
> The thing that gets me is that no matter how many times you show a guy
> documentation on women
> in the ranks during the CW, they still balk at it. Do you think its
> because they don't
> want to be out shot by a woman? :-)
How about that for every few thousand soldiers in the field, there MAY
They are doing historical reenactment, not SCA "playing what I wanna
Effingham
have been a woman fighting in drag. Definitely not one out of ten, or
one out of five.
be."
From: "Anthony J. Bryant" <ajbryant@indiana.edu>
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ to unsubscribe, send a message to
`~-, ,-~`~-, ,-~`~-, ,-~`~-, ,-~` majordomo@midrealm.org with
. | | | | | | | | 'unsubscribe sca-middle' as its body.
Received on Thu Dec 30 21:02:01 1999
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu 04 Mar 2004 08:38:18 AM EST EST