> >And since we only have the "pre-17th century" requirement, I don't see
how
> >we can shut out anything that was done, worn, or made in period as
> >"inauthentic"
>
> So if we were a 20th century recreation group, an Apollo space helmet,
some
> love beads, a zoot-suit jacket, a teal mohawk and some Warsaw Pact
camoflage
> fatigue pants with WWI "dough-boy's" leggings would be authentic garb?
Say rather that none of them would be *inappropriate* to wear to an event
for such a group, and that in a thousand years, (with the possible exception
of the space helmet) that above outfit probably would just look
"historical", even if they were all worn together. of course, if worn
separately, (by someone who took the time to say, build an authentic-looking
apollo astronaut get-up), it'd look a lot *better*, though.... :)
Breac
From: "Christopher Hale" <breac@atrweb.net>
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ to unsubscribe, send a message to
`~-, ,-~`~-, ,-~`~-, ,-~`~-, ,-~` majordomo@midrealm.org with
. | | | | | | | | 'unsubscribe sca-middle' as its body.
Received on Tue Jan 15 04:26:52 2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed 03 Mar 2004 10:56:57 PM EST EST