Quoting jen funk segrest <jen@verybigdesign.com>:
> > For what weaves (e.g. velvet, brocade, etc.) do you think it's
> > acceptable to "cheat" and use easily available artificial fibers
> > instead of rare and expensive natural fibers?
> I think it's more important to sew it well. Just need a t-tunic? Fine,
> don't just flat seam it, learn to french seam or take the effort to
> serge or zag them.
Isn't modern fabric substitution comparable to modern production technique?
Isn't using a serger or zigzag "cheating"?
Serging isn't much like any period technique I've seen, with the exception of
the 14th-century card-woven-on-the-dress-trim, and even then, that's only there
to protect an edge, not to seam/protect a seam. I've seen a very few period
seams that were turned under, and those were silk. Additionally, machine-
frenching gives you a line down the edge...
Most wools will not ravel - and I have linen smocks that are raw-edged seams
(as an experiment) that haven't raveled.
seaming fabric cut on the bias doesn't require reinforcement either...
I'm bringing this up not to poke holes in your arguement, because I agree with
Constance
-------------------------------------------------
you 95% - but I've seen people criticize appropriately-sewn hand-sewn garments
because the seams weren't finished - and I think this is an important issue...
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
From: constancefairfax@itasca.net
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ to unsubscribe, send a message to
`~-, ,-~`~-, ,-~`~-, ,-~`~-, ,-~` majordomo@midrealm.org with
. | | | | | | | | 'unsubscribe sca-middle' as its body.
Received on Fri Oct 10 18:02:39 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed 03 Mar 2004 02:30:20 PM EST EST